HNS WEEK IN REVIEW---AUGUST 1-2, 2009
For our Week in Review, we'll have the usual First or Only stories of the week. We'll look back at a day-long County Board meeting, where each time commissioners acted, Hernando News Source was the first to report the action, with live updates in real-time from the meeting, But first we have the last in a series of Special Reports on the Spring Hill Fire business tax, where we try to pull it all together.
SPECIAL REPORT: SPRING HILL FIRE BUSINESS TAX
MILLIONS IN REVENUE LOST, MILLIONS IN TAX SAVED BY BUSINESS

The Spring Hill Fire District lost millions of dollars in tax revenue over the last 13 years because no one noticed a change in a county ordinance that a district lawyer says required assessment of tangible personal property business tax.
OR
Spring Hill businesses got a multi-million dollar tax break over the last 13 years because no one noticed a change in a county ordinance that a district lawyer says required assessment of tangible personal property business tax.
The story got started last week when the Spring Hill Fire Board voted for a resolution asking county commissioners to impose the tangible personal property business tax as part of this year's Spring Hill Fire ad valorem tax assessment. The move caused an uproar among people who said the board should not be imposing "new" taxes. Some questioned the legality of the move. Others said it was politically unwise in the current tough economic times, although fire board members insisted only the larger businesses would see any impact.
But Terry Lewis says the story really started 13 years ago.
Lewis is the outside lawyer hired by the Fire District to provide a legal opinion on the authority for the business tax. His eight-page letter, which Spring Hill Fire Chief Mike Rampino got Tuesday minutes after telling County Board Chairman Dave Russell not to go forward with the Fire Board's resolution, actually says that the resolution wasn't legally necessary. That's because, Lewis says, the business tax has been in effect for Spring Hill Fire since a county ordinance was amended back in 1996. In the creation of the taxing unit that raised revenue for the district, commissioners approved wording that said the Spring Hill ad valorem millage rate applied to "all property" in the district. The old ordinance limited the Fire District levy to "real property." Lewis' opinion says the legal effect of the change was to require assessment against tangible personal property, though with exemptions the tax would have been felt only by larger businesses.
When the opinion's import was revealed by Hernando News Source, we sought comments from the Hernando County Property Appraiser's office. It's the Property Appraiser's responsibility to certify a taxable value for both real and tangible personal property to each taxing authority in the district. An examination of those certifications over the past three years shows that the line for tangible property taxable value was filled in for EVERY taxing unit in the county EXCEPT for Spring Hill Fire.

The Appraiser's office also provided a document estimating current taxable tangible value in the Spring Hill Fire District at $216 million and figuring business tax revenue for the 2.2686 millage rate at $490,552.82. Conservatively estimated at an average of $400,000 per year, the last 12 years under the revised ordinance would mean almost $5 million in uncollected fire district revenue. Of course, in keeping with the dual lead to the story, the reader might prefer to say that means that Spring Hill businesses got to keep $5 million rather than pay it in taxes.
In any event, as of yet, no lawyer has taken issue with Lewis' opinion. Generally, when there is a change in the language of a law or ordinance, the law presumes there was an intent to change the effect of the law. But the apparent error in applying the revised ordinance language is one that is clearly shared. The Property Appraiser provided a copy of the 1973 ordinance as its justification for leaving the tangible tax line blank for Spring Hill Fire. And it appears that neither county nor fire district officials ever made any attempt to have the Property Appraiser review the matter. Fire officials said they learned of the potential tangible property business tax revenue only recently, in a conversation with Appraiser's office staff. County budget chief George Zoettlein says he had no information to counter the Property Appraiser's blank tangible tax value line on the certification form. County lawyers said the issue was one they were never made aware of until now. Commission Chairman Dave Russell, who vowed to oppose a business tax for Spring Hill Fire, has not responded to e-mailed invitations for comment to Hernando News Source.
So, if the Lewis opinion is correct, an inadvertent mistake by the Appraiser's office, county staff, and fire district officials has shorted the district about $5 million in revenue over 13 years, or stated another way, has allowed Spring Hill businesses to keep $5 million that would have been paid if the tangible business tax had been assessed and collected. And the Fire Board's resolution wouldn't even be needed, because as Lewis said the tangible tax levy is required unless the 1996 ordinance language is changed.
However, the future is likely very different. The ballot language required by the district's independence law, which will be voted on in November 2010, would seem clear: "Shall the Spring Hill Independent Fire District be authorized to levy property taxes up to 2.5 mills on jurisdiction lands to provide fire and rescue services?" If the referendum is approved, there would be no more business tax issue, since there would be no authority to levy tax on anything other than real property.
But that doesn't change the past 13 years, the lost revenue, and the money saved by businesses despite a contrary ordinance. And that's the bottom line of the Hernando News Source special reports.
Following are this week's stories and the Special Reports from Thursday and Friday on the Spring Hill Fire business tax.
MONDAY:
FIRE BOARD'S BUSINESS TAX DEAD FOR THIS YEAR?
The controversial Spring Hill Fire Board's tangible property business tax request is not officially on the County Commission's agenda for their regular meeting on Tuesday. Though Fire District officials haven't confirmed it, it's believed the political uproar as well as the still-unanswered legal questions about the newly independent district's tax authority may have killed the tangible tax move for this year just days after the Fire Board voted 4-1 to ask the commission to levy the tax on its behalf.
WEDNESDAY:
LEGAL OPINION SAYS COUNTY COULD LEVY FIRE BOARD'S BUSINESS TAX
An eight-page legal opinion prepared for Spring Hill Fire Chief Mike Rampino says there was nothing improper or illegal about the Fire Board's request to the county for a levy of tangible personal property tax against Spring Hill businesses. The opinion from Terry Lewis of Lewis, Longman & Walker says Florida law and county ordinances allow the county to assess the business tax on behalf of its specially created tax units. Until an election next year, the Spring Hill Fire Board does not have independent authority to levy any ad valorem tax, and the board's resolution from last week's meeting asking for county levy of the business tax led to legal and political questions. The item was not on Tuesday's County agenda, and no action was taken on the resolution. The Lewis opinion does not say whether the independent fire board would have the authority to levy the tax after voters approve a maximum ad valorem levy in next's year's vote. Nor does it say whether or not the tax needed to be noticed on next month's TRIM mailings.
THURSDAY:
SPECIAL REPORT: SPRING HILL FIRE BUSINESS TAX
LAWYER SAYS BUSINESS TAX REQUIRED BY COUNTY ORDINANCE
The legal opinion provided to Spring Hill Fire Chief Mike Rampino this week not only says that Hernando County could levy a tangible personal property tax against Spring Hill businesses. Most of the opinion actually addresses existing law and ordinances and concludes that "at the present time and unless Hernando County's Code of Ordinances is amended, the [Spring Hill Fire tax unit] must levy ad valorem taxes on 'all property' which includes real and tangible personal property." The opinion by Terry Lewis of Lewis, Longman and Walker cites an existing county code section that says ad valorem tax will be levied on "all property" within the Spring Hill Fire tax unit. Lewis says the lack of any distinction between real property and personal property means that, absent ordinance change, the county has no discretion and must assess tangible personal property tax in Spring Hill. Left unspoken in the opinion is a question on the minds of several today...if the levy is required by county ordinance, why hasn't the tangible property tax been collected over the years from Spring Hill businesses?
FRIDAY:
SPECIAL REPORT: SPRING HILL FIRE BUSINESS TAX
TAX FORM LEFT TANGIBLE TAX LINE BLANK
Hernando News Source has learned that a taxable value form prepared each year by the Property Appraiser for the Spring Hill Fire District has traditionally left the tangible property line blank. This despite an ordinance of the county commissioners imposing ad valorem tax on "all property" in the district. A lawyer's opinion to the district fire chief this week says that ordinance requires a levy of tangible personal property tax, but the blank taxable value on the DR-420 form filled out each year by the Property Appraiser and signed off on by county administrative staff meant that no tangible tax was collected. Current and past county officials who spoke off the record with Hernando News Source said they had no basic disagreement with the opinion's conclusion, but that the issue had not been raised before, and without a taxable value for Spring Hill tangible property from the Appraiser, they had no basis to assess the tax. Commissioners declined to schedule action this week on a Fire Board resolution asking specifically for county assessment of the tangible tax. Nick Nikkinen of the Property Appraiser's office noted Friday that the original Spring Hill Fire ordinance from 1973 did not authorize assessment of tangible property, and said his office is still reviewing the latest legal opinion. That opinion cited Hernando County Code provisions as amended in the early 1990's.
NOW HERE'S A RECAP OF OUR COVERAGE OF THE COUNTY'S BOARD'S TUESDAY MEETING AND BUDGET DISCUSSION:
COMMISSIONERS STICK WITH CURRENT MILLAGE RATES

SHERIFF DISCUSSES BUDGET CUT OPTIONS WITH COMMISSIONERS

COUNTY TO FUND CANNERY, LESSEE WITHDRAWS OFFER

ELECTIONS SUPERVISOR DEFENDS COSTS

EARLY LEAVE APPROVED FOR ALL SIX-YEAR COUNTY EMPLOYEES

LANDFILL PRIVATIZING COULD ELIMINATE 22 JOBS

GRANT MONEY COULD PUT LIBRARIES BACK ON SCHEDULE

AND FINALLY, HERE ARE OTHER STORIES YOU SAW (OR COULD HAVE SEEN) FIRST OR ONLY AT HERNANDO NEWS SOURCE.
GAS PRICES SET TO RISE AGAIN?
Last month we were the first in Hernando to report that gas prices were actually set for a mid-summer drop in prices. Unfortunately, now we report that the latest Auto Club South survey indicates that pump prices may be set to go up again. Spring Hill resident and local AAA spokesman Gregg Laskoski says the trends suggest that local and national fuel costs have bottomed and may be on the way up. He cites the stock market jump of the last week as well as an increase in crude oil prices, even though demand remains flat. The Tampa metro chart shows that the move to lower pump prices came to an end last week.
| Tampa-St. Petersburg | Regular | Mid | Premium | Diesel |
| Current | $2.436 | $2.638 | $2.687 | $2.514 |
| Yesterday | $2.435 | $2.638 | $2.686 | $2.520 |
| Week Ago | $2.453 | $2.657 | $2.707 | $2.522 |
| Month Ago | $2.643 | $2.863 | $2.916 | $2.647 |
| Year Ago | $3.916 | $4.119 | $4.195 | $4.750 |
DEPUTIES BUST GROW HOUSE, ARREST FIVE FOR CULTIVATING POT

BROOKSVILLE GETS STIMULUS MONEY FOR POLICE
The Miami Herald reported Tuesday that the City of Brooksville has been awarded a federal grant for $134,000 for hiring police. The Herald says that the Obama administration announced another round of grants for law enforcement agencies to help keep more cops on the beat during the economic downturn -- and tried to assure cities not getting aid that they won't be stiffed. The grants in Florida reportedly ranged from a high of $11 million to the Miami Police Department to the $134,000 for the Brooksville police department. The aid announced by Vice President Joe Biden and Attorney General Eric Holder in Philadelphia is just a fraction of what police departments across the country had hoped to get. For every $1 to be delivered, another $7 in requests will go unanswered under the grant program, Community Oriented Policing Services, commonly called COPS. About 7,000 state and local agencies applied for aid under the COPS program that is part of the $787 billion stimulus package passed earlier this year. Of those, only about 1,000 were approved. Each state is entitled to at least $5 million in COPS money.
FOUR GET RABIES TREATMENT AFTER ATTACK BY RABID FOX
The Hernando County Health Department said Wednesday that four people are undergoing treatment for rabies exposure after they were bit or scratched by a fox near Brooksville. The Health Department said the four were attacked Saturday in the Hidden Valley Campground/Wesleyan Village area off Cortez Blvd. east of Brooksville. The fox was killed by its last victim and tested positive for rabies at a Health Department lab in Tampa. Officials said that residents should exercise caution with animals that commonly carry the rabies virus, including especially raccoons, bats, foxes and skunks. They are reminding the public that animals with rabies may show strange behavior or may be aggressive or appear tame. They may also drool due to swallowing difficulty or may stagger or become paralyzed.
SUSPECT SOUGHT IN MASARYKTOWN ARMED ROBBERY
FIVE SPRING HILL JUVENILES CHARGED WITH GRAND THEFT, BURGLARY
The daily arrest report from the Hernando County Jail Friday includes five juveniles ranging in age from eleven to thirteen facing felony charges as a result of incidents in Spring Hill. Though the youngsters are identified and pictured on the public record report, Hernando News Source is not using their names. Four of them, three 12-year olds and an 11-year old, are facing grand theft charges. No details of the crime were immediately available, but jail records show the quartet were all arrested at 4608 Landover Boulevard. The fifth juvenile, a 13-year old, is accused of burglary of a dwelling. His arrest location is listed as 4133 Dristol Avenue. A sheriff's report says the 13-year old was charged with breaking into a screened pool area and with taking swim goggles. He claimed he had permission to use the goggles and swim in the pool, but residents of tthe home said that wasn't true.
WOMAN FACES NINE DRUG-RELATED CHARGES

FORECLOSURE PACE INCREASES IN JULY

IF YOU'RE NOT A REGULAR HERNANDO NEWS SOURCE VISITOR, YOU MAY BE MISSING ALL THE LOCAL NEWS.
Re: SHFD and their "lost" monies. Me thinks that the headline should read: "SHFD vs Hernando County, Who Wins and Who Loses" with a sub-headline of "W=Attorneys, L=Taxpayers". Aren't you, Mr HNS, happy you bailed before getting in the middle of this one? My primary question is: Can a county and an entity within the county both tax the same tangible property? For instance, Spring Hill taxpayers don't pay a county fire assessment because of SHFD and Hernando taxpayers don't pay for SHFD. Would not a percentage of amount of the tangible property tax collected by the county within Spring Hill belong (though undeserved) to the SHFD? If so, then businesses have not escaped paying anything. The county is the one on the plus side here with monies collected and spent. And, as a final note, Just as Obama and his liberal friends try to sell the folks on taxing of the rich while leaving the middle class alone fails in the reality just as "only the big businesses would have to pay the tangible property tax". Common sense will tell you that it's real easy to have $25,000 or more in tangible property no matter the size of the business. My hope is that Spring Hill businesses fight this craziness until it fails completely, not just for now. If this stays in the news long enough, the vote next year to allow SHFD to collect taxes will go down and flames and that's not a bad thing!
opaquely, keep up the good work Mr. HNS, pellucid
Reply to this
Can a county and an entity within the county both tax the same tangible property?
Yes, e.g., County and City of Brooksville; County and EMS MSTU; etc. The tangible tax line is filled in on those DR-420's, just not on Spring HIll's.
Would not a percentage of amount of the tangible property tax collected by the county within Spring Hill belong (though undeserved) to the SHFD?
Not under current state TPP tax law.
"W=Attorneys, L=Taxpayers".
Ask the next Great Brooksvillian, or as some would say, just plain Villian.
Reply to this